p2pnet news » Blog Archive » RIAA pays Tanyan Andersen $107,951.
Single mum Tanya Andersen and her daughter, Kylee, have come to epitomize the victims of the Big 4’s RIAA as the labels continue to pursue their hopeless course of trying to sue consumers around the world into buying their formulaic, cookie-cutter ‘product’.
She and her lawyers, Lory Lybeck and Ben Justus, beat the labels and their enforcer to a standstill, and a judge ordered them to pay the price.
To recap for those just joining the program. The recording industry decided that to combat a decline in sales they attributed to Internet piracy, they would begin suing individual users of the Internet to recover damages. The damages are roughly $250 per song, per instance of piracy. So a 10 track CD would cost you $2500 if you could be shown to have either downloaded it or allowed it to be downloaded just once from a computer or account under your control.
To find these villanous pirates they employed Media Sentry, a computer security company of obviously dubious ethics and began suing willy nilly.
Aside from wisdom of suing your own customers, the tactics and evidence employed and presented have a stink about them you can smell for miles. Tanya Andersen is a disabled single mother who fell afoul of this campaign. Now the courts have found that the record companies are full of cow pies and forced them to pay her back for attorney fees and expenses plus interest. To the tune of over $100,000.
Normally I am not a fan of suing those who have wronged you, but this time I am all for it. Andersen vs Atlantic is the counter suit to recover (I’m assuming) pain and suffering and punative damages. The reason I’m looking forward to this is that the music industry is still suing thousands of other individuals and a win here could effectively end this harebrained scheme.
In related news, the German Court system appears to be fed up with the Euro version of this nonsense and declares that it will only consider these cases when the piracy is on a commercial-scale.