It looks like the whole "Intelligent Design" (ID) nonsense is going to replace the RIAA as my favorite thing to worry about for awhile. I shall be posting more on the topic. But most of it will revolve around this thought:
Evolution is taught because we accept the Scientific Method as an unbiased explanation of our world as best we can understand it. Any other argument, be it from the ID crowd, Pastafarians or others has at its core a belief that is not shared among all members of the society. Seperation of Church and State means that the State functions without religous beliefs since a pluralistic society cannot agree on which beliefs to use. If you want your kid to learn ID or creationism or Flying SPaghetti Monsterism then either teach them yourself or find a private school that teaches it. Better yet, go to church. But leave it the hell out of the public educational system.
The article linked below has some excellent insights and I recommend it.
Dennett’s NYT op-ed on the Intelligent Design hoax - Xeni Jardin:
John Brockman’s EDGE.org just published the full text of philosopher Daniel Dennett’s NYT op-ed from August 28. In the article, Dennett examines why the notion of so-called Intelligent Design has become so popular, in spite of the fact it cannot be substantiated by science.
"Is ‘intelligent design’ a legitimate school of scientific thought? Is there something to it, or have these people been taken in by one of the most ingenious hoaxes in the history of science? Wouldn’t such a hoax be impossible? No. Here’s how it has been done."
Link, and here’s the same text on the NYT website (reg required). (Thanks, Chris, and many others!)
Image: a devotional chalk icon of the Flying Spaghetti Monster — the only truly intelligent alternative — on a university campus in Georgia. (Thanks, Graham)
(Via Boing Boing)